
Satsop, Washington · the plant from above, cut away at the main level: rooms, corridors and the containment ring · Showcase
Satsop · Washington · Industrial and indoor
Satsop plant study
Inside an unfinished nuclear power plant: two separate survey campaigns, registered to each other and fused on a 2 cm grid into one model of rooms, stairs and the containment ring.
Showcase: GroundMap processing of public survey data. No affiliation with the site owner or the survey teams.
- Offset between the two campaigns as delivered, removed by registration
- 20cm
- Held-out median mismatch between the two campaigns after alignment
- 13.2mm
- Surface measured by both campaigns where the two agree within 3 cm
- 86%
The study
Two campaigns,
one plant
Two survey campaigns through the same unfinished plant, delivered separately, each registered on its own.
Challenge
Two campaigns surveyed the plant for the DARPA Subterranean Challenge, each delivered as its own registered point cloud. As delivered, the second sat about 20 cm from the first, and after the best rigid fit the two still bent apart by up to about 4 cm in patches across the plant: each campaign's own registration had bent a little.
Approach
Both read straight from the delivered archives: 1.05 billion points. The second campaign registered onto the first, rigidly and then with a smooth elastic correction of at most 46 mm, checked on held-out points. Then both fused on a 2 cm grid, with a per-point record of which campaign measured each surface and how closely the two agree.
Outcome
One model of the plant's main level: 150 million points on a 2 cm grid and about 68,500 m² of surface. The campaigns mostly covered different rooms and floors, so fusion completes the plant. Where both measured the same surface, their fused surfaces agree to a median of about 10 mm, 86 % within 3 cm; on points held out of the fit, the median mismatch is 13.2 mm.
Confidence classes
The model's Confidence view, point by point.
- Both agree within 10 mmBoth survey campaigns measured the surface, and their surfaces lie within 10 mm of each other.
- Both agree within 30 mmBoth campaigns measured it, 10 to 30 mm apart.
- One campaignMeasured by one campaign only: the two mostly covered different rooms and floors.
- Campaigns disagreeBoth campaigns measured it, more than 30 mm apart: something moved between them, or the campaigns still differ there.
Stated limits
- The figures are registration agreement between scans, not absolute accuracy against control: the dataset has no survey control.
- Only 3.9 % of the surface was measured by both campaigns; the rest of the model rests on one survey.
- Colour is the mean of the two campaigns' photo colour; exposure varies from station to station.
- The interior of the containment was never scanned: it shows as an empty disc.
- In the web view the plant is cut 2 m above the main floor so the rooms can be seen from above.



Projects
All projects ↗
Hobart 3D city model
Three airborne surveys flown over 16 years, fused into one true-colour model of the city centre. Every point graded, every modelled wall flagged.
- Measured points, three surveys
- 348million
- Points where two or more aligned surveys agree within 15 cm
- 64.7million
- Modelled wall points, every one flagged
- 49.8million

El Teniente underground study
44 robot-captured laser scans, delivered as raw text: no GPS, no colour, nothing aligned. Registered to each other and fused into one model of two kilometres of production tunnels.
- Laser scans registered into one model, with no GPS
- 44
- Overlapping surface registered within 1 cm
- 98.7%
- Scan pairs fitted more closely than by the dataset's published poses; the other 25 as closely, within 1 mm
- 153of 178

Change detection study: Rosebery, Lake Mackenzie, Forcett–Dunalley
Eleven years of earthworks at a mine site and two bushfires, measured from repeat airborne LiDAR: every pair of surveys aligned on stable ground, and only change beyond the level of detection counted.
- Placed beyond the level of detection (95 %), Rosebery, 2015 to 2026 (0.59 million m³ removed)
- 1.56million m³
- Area where canopy cover fell beyond the level of detection (95 %): Lake Mackenzie, 2013 to 2016
- 10,695ha
- Area where canopy cover fell beyond the level of detection (95 %): Forcett–Dunalley, 2011 to 2013
- 1,915ha
Hobart 3D city model: Showcase: GroundMap processing of public survey data, not client work. Survey data: Hobart City 2023/24 (captured by Fugro for the State of Tasmania; theLIST; CC BY 3.0 AU), Climate Futures Derwent 2008 (captured by DiMAP for ACE CRC; ACE CRC licence) and Mount Wellington 2011 (no licence on record), via ELVIS. Processing: GroundMap. El Teniente underground study: Showcase: GroundMap processing of public survey data. Survey data: Chilean underground mine dataset, Advanced Mining Technology Center (AMTC), Universidad de Chile (Leung et al., IJRR 2017; CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 CL). Processing: GroundMap. No affiliation with the mine operator or the dataset authors. Change detection study: Rosebery, Lake Mackenzie, Forcett–Dunalley: Showcase: GroundMap processing of public survey data. Survey data: West Coast 2015 (theLIST; CC BY 3.0 AU), Rosebery 2026 (theLIST; CC BY 3.0 AU), North West 2013 (theLIST; CC BY 3.0 AU), Lake Mackenzie Road 2016 (theLIST; CC BY 3.0 AU), South East 2011 (theLIST; CC BY 3.0 AU) and Greater Hobart 2013 (no licence on record), via ELVIS. Fire perimeters: Fire History (Tasmania Fire Service) from theLIST © State of Tasmania (CC BY 3.0 AU). Vegetation classes: TASVEG 5.0 (NRE Tas) from theLIST © State of Tasmania (CC BY 3.0 AU). Aerial imagery © State of Tasmania (Land Tasmania), Rosebery flights of December 2015 and February 2026 (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 AU). Processing: GroundMap. No affiliation with the operator of the Rosebery mine.